ARCWAY INDUSTRIES LLC · EXECUTIVE TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY

Govern technology spend.
Make defensible vendor decisions.

Independent executive technology advisory for investment decisions, software spend and vendor governance.

Professional/business services, B2B SaaS and technology-enabled services companies with $20M–$150M annual revenue, 100–500 employees and $1M–$5M annual non-personnel technology spend. Primary buyers: CEO, CFO, COO, VP Finance.

Request a Technology Diagnostic Review Specimen Decision Memo

100% Vendor-Neutral

0% reseller margins or software kickbacks

4-Week Baseline

Capped deliverable sprint & roadmap

3-Year TCO Modeling

Full capital, license & migration drag math

Boardroom Readout

Defensible executive presentation for CFOs

The Mid-Market Blindspot

Where Technology Budgets Bleed: Software Sprawl & Auto-Renewals.

Technology decisions become harder when application ownership, usage and vendor obligations are not visible in one place. The Baseline brings these inputs together for an agreed primary decision.

A renewal review examines notice periods, licensing terms and functional overlap. These obligations vary by agreement; findings depend on the contracts and usage evidence supplied.

Vendor-neutral advisory supports leadership decisions alongside existing IT teams and service providers. Identified opportunities do not guarantee savings.

Capped 4-Week Sprint

The Technology Decision Baseline.

A defined Technology Decision Baseline project, followed by an optional separately scoped advisory agreement.

Standard scope covers up to 15 applications, 10 material vendors and one operating entity. Deliverables are an application/spend ledger, a technology decision memo evaluating up to three options for one primary decision, a 12-month roadmap and an executive readout.

The standard delivery window is four weeks after the executed agreement, required commercial prerequisites, completed intake, necessary documents and agreed access are in place. It does not start at first contact.

Week 01Spend Discovery

Application & Spend Inventory Ledger

Review up to 15 applications, including licensing, use, renewal dates and functional overlap within the agreed scope.

Week 02Capital Modeling

Technology Decision Memo & TCO Modeling

Evaluate up to three options for one primary technology decision, including the status quo, using three-year total cost of ownership and implementation risk.

Week 03Strategic Sequencing

12-Month Prioritized Technology Roadmap

Sequence technology priorities, renewals and system upgrades against enterprise budget milestones in a 12-month investment roadmap.

Week 04Executive Synthesis

Boardroom Readout & Executive Briefing

A 60-minute executive readout for the CFO, COO and key stakeholders to review the Baseline findings, options and roadmap.

Specimen Artifact · For Demonstration Only

Inside the Technology Decision Memo.

Review an illustrative specimen of a technology decision comparison using three-year total cost of ownership. These modeled values are not customer results.

Executive Evaluation Specimen

Core Systems Modernization vs. Tier-1 ERP Replacement

Illustrative Profile: $45M Multi-Entity Professional Services Firm

Evaluation Period: 36 Months

Recommendation: Option C

Evaluation Vector	Option A: Patch & Extend	Option B: Tier-1 ERP Replacement	Option C (Recommended): Best-of-Breed + Middleware
Implementation Horizon	Immediate / Continuous	14–18 Months (High Risk)	4–5 Months (Phased)
Upfront Capital Outlay	$45,000 (Custom scripts)	$480,000 (Licensing + SIs)	$120,000 (API Middleware)
3-Year Projected TCO	$590,000 (Escalating tech debt)	$1,350,000 (Heavy customization)	$485,000 (Modeled TCO)
Internal Team Capacity Drag	15h/week manual data re-entry	30–40h/week dedicated PM staff	6h/week transition oversight
Operational Disruption Risk	Severe (Unpatched failure risk)	Extreme (Billing freeze risk)	Low (Parallel shadow run)

Illustrative Rationale: This modeled comparison considers implementation cost, internal capacity and disruption risk. The values and recommendation are demonstration assumptions, not observed customer outcomes or a promise of savings.

Vendor Neutrality Commitment

Our Affirmative 0% Vendor Reseller Warranty.

Arcway Industries LLC accepts 0% commissions, finder's fees, rebates, or reseller margins from software vendors, cloud platforms, or MSPs. We sell zero hardware and zero software licenses. Our advice is independent and vendor-neutral.

Scope Note: Arcway acts strictly as an independent strategic, technical, and financial advisor. Client corporate officers retain ultimate corporate fiduciary authority over all capital allocations, contract executions, and system implementations.

Explicit Operational Scope Boundaries

These standard advisory services exclude:

✕No Tier-1 / Tier-2 end-user helpdesk support or password resets.
✕No hardware procurement, physical server cabling, or laptop provisioning.
✕No hands-on custom software engineering or production code deployment.
✕No daily production database, server, or cloud network administration.

Executive Inquiries

Frequently Addressed Technology Questions.

Who is TEEVA vCIO for?

TEEVA vCIO serves CEO, CFO, COO and VP Finance buyers at professional/business services, B2B SaaS and technology-enabled services companies with $20M–$150M annual revenue, 100–500 employees and $1M–$5M annual non-personnel technology spend.

How are vCIO engagements structured?

Engagements begin with a defined Technology Decision Baseline project. Ongoing technology advisory is optional under a separate agreement following the Baseline; it is not automatically included.

What does the Technology Decision Baseline deliver?

It delivers an application and spend inventory ledger, a technology decision memo, a 12-month investment roadmap and an executive readout. Standard scope covers up to 15 applications, 10 material vendors and one operating entity.

When does the four-week Baseline delivery window start?

How do you compare technology options?

The decision memo evaluates up to three options, including the status quo, using three-year total cost of ownership and implementation risk. Recommendations are vendor-neutral. Evaluation is distinct from implementing or migrating the selected system.

Can vCIO work with our existing MSP or internal IT team?

TEEVA's advisory can support executive decisions and coordinate with existing teams. It does not replace the operational duties assigned to existing IT teams and providers. Fit depends on your unmet needs.

How are your recommendations vendor-neutral?

TEEVA's stated advisory policy is to avoid vendor commissions, referral fees and resale margins. Recommendations consider the customer's requirements, costs and risks.

How does advisory compare with hiring a full-time executive?

The appropriate choice depends on the duties, authority, coverage and continuity you require. A defined advisory engagement and a full-time employee serve different needs; no compensation or savings comparison is implied.

Initiate Technology Governance

Ready to Rationalize Your Technology Spend?

Technology Decision Diagnostic

Request a diagnostic conversation about your software landscape, upcoming renewals and Baseline fit. Scope, availability and timing require confirmation.

Request Technology Diagnostic

Inquire on Scope & Retainers

Request the defined Baseline scope and, if needed, a separate ongoing advisory agreement. Investment details follow scope confirmation.

Inquire Regarding Scope

Govern technology spend.Make defensible vendor decisions.